| Login to reply | Page: « < 1 of 1 > » |
| 17 Jun 2010 - 12:58 | 2725 |
| Dio New Member Joined: 09 Jun 2010 Posts: 33 | AFF_DONOTUSE What's the reason this flag was added (sometime post-Circle 3.1)? Couldn't find any specific reference to it in the changelog. |
![]() |
| 17 Jun 2010 - 20:10 | 2728 |
| Dio New Member Joined: 09 Jun 2010 Posts: 33 | Hmmm, searching the history it looks like it was part of the 128 bit patch, is that right? |
![]() |
| 18 Jun 2010 - 01:59 | 2732 |
| Rumble Contributor ![]() Joined: 04 Jul 2007 Posts: 592 | The dontuse is due to the associated array in constants.c, I'm not sure why they did it this way. __________________ Rumble The Builder Academy tbamud.com 9091 ![]() |
![]() |
| 18 Jun 2010 - 08:12 | 2734 |
| Dio New Member Joined: 09 Jun 2010 Posts: 33 | I'm stuck trying to think of a reason.
Seems to just add complexity to me (such as asciiflag_conv_aff - although that in itself may be a sign of a momentary lack of clear thinking, since it's both broken for numeric fields in the worldfile and would be more trivially replaced by just using asciiflag_conf and a left shift by 1). If I had to guess, it had some effect in the code that the 128 patch was sourced from, but that didn't apply when it was pulled into TBA? |
![]() |
| Login to reply | Page: « < 1 of 1 > » |